Thank you, Chair.
Just let me recollect my thoughts. I thought I was being persuasive. I'll try harder.
From Mr. McKay's definition, it's quite clear that Minister Oda never expressed or never showed any contempt for the House, because she never had any. There is no evidence that there was any intent to cause a misunderstanding or confusion. An intent is what the law requires. This is what the common law requires, this is what parliamentary law requires--that the person have intent.
If every minister or member of Parliament who caused a misunderstanding, who caused some confusion--