Thanks so much.
If I could, I'll quickly return to where we ended on the last question, which is the exception for “subject to binding agreement” of a party.
Mr. Lynch, is that effectively just a new version of the same loan?
On October 18th, 2012. See this statement in context.
Craig Scott NDP Toronto—Danforth, ON
Thanks so much.
If I could, I'll quickly return to where we ended on the last question, which is the exception for “subject to binding agreement” of a party.
Mr. Lynch, is that effectively just a new version of the same loan?
See context to find out what was said next.