The problem is that we would be moving away from the objective of the bill, which is to limit the influence of individuals or companies on the operation of the electoral process. Yet in Ontario, there are no limits on guarantees, even if they are provided by corporations or unions.
It could be looked at, but I think that would be moving some distance away from the objective of the bill, which is to limit the influence of money. In my opinion, if we allow guarantees to be unlimited, we would be indirectly permitting the very thing we wanted to directly prohibit.