I have two quick questions following up on my friend's comment about Parliament maybe being exposed to losing a case in court around this particular topic.
With so many interested groups around the country engaged in access to information, do you have any ideas as to why this hasn't been tried if the act is so potentially in conflict?
Second, there was an assertion made that government departments would also be broadly covered, if I'm understanding this correctly, by this parliamentary privilege component. Have we seen evidence of that? I may have missed that in your testimony. Am I misreading what you said earlier?