Right. That's kind of where I was going, so I appreciate the answer.
The chief justice gave a speech this year reminding us that the court in the Lavigne case referred to the Access to Information Act as quasi-constitutional. If you look at the purpose of the act, in subsection 2(1), it addresses giving effect to “the principles that government information should be available to the public”. If you look at the notion of transparency and how it's connected to the underlying constitutional principle of democracy itself, in the Supreme Court's reference case you can see where the quasi-constitutional idea comes from. I just wanted to make that clear.