I don't get the sense that the commission didn't listen to our concerns. I feel they have a pretty big job, and as they've solved some concerns, unknowingly they've created others. I don't think it was the case of their ignoring concerns and saying, “Oh, sorry, it just doesn't work out”. They did mention in the report.... As I said, we recommended they go into Foothills, but because of other shifts they had made, that wouldn't have worked. I could only talk to them about the map they had before us, and I couldn't really imagine what other changes they were going to make.
I agree with Mr. Payne that based on the second map that they've shown, it has created some other concerns that didn't exist under the first map. I can't imagine the commission having any problems with what we're proposing. It falls within their mandate and falls within the philosophy that they seem to be holding to, according to both reports that came with the first two maps.