Evidence of meeting #59 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was lethbridge.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Benoit Montpetit  Team Leader, Technical Expert, Electoral Geography, Elections Canada

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Jim Hillyer Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Yes. It's not just that they'd be dominated by a city. Right now these communities are in a riding that's dominated—about half the riding is the city. In fact, as you'll see on many of the letters from the mayors, if they had their way they'd stay in the Lethbridge riding, which is dominated by a city. But they feel connected to that city; they feel a part of that city. Most of the people in those communities call Lethbridge their city. When it receives funding to fix scenic drives, that helps them.

But Medicine Hat is a city with which they have little or nothing to do. They're saying that if they can't be in a riding that includes their city, they don't want to be in a riding that includes a big city with which they have little to do. They feel they'd be much better represented if they were in a purely rural riding.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

So there are gradations from okay to worst scenarios. The worst scenario is to be.... The best scenario would.... I don't want to put words in your mouth. Tell me the best scenario.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Jim Hillyer Conservative Lethbridge, AB

I think you're right. If I'm going to put words in your mouth, I'll say the best scenario for them would be to change nothing. They love their riding. It makes sense to them. It's a rural-city mix, but it's a rural mix with their city.

That's their preference, but they understand that when you add six ridings something's got to give. As it is, the Lethbridge riding is a rural-city mix. The rural towns in the County of Lethbridge are delighted with it. The city has no trouble with its rural counterparts. They certainly are happy that they didn't split the city in two.

The worst case would be to be in a huge geographical riding that is dominated by a city with which they have nothing to do. Instead of trying to buy something they can't have, they want to buy something they can have. They feel that being included in the Bow River riding is the best option.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Thank you.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

There's about one minute left.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Perhaps my colleague has some questions.

11:25 a.m.

An hon. member

No, but thank you.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

In that case, that is all. Thank you.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Mr. Dion, you have seven minutes.

February 12th, 2013 / 11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

How many ridings are affected by your change? Is it only your two?

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Jim Hillyer Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Go ahead.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

LaVar Payne Conservative Medicine Hat, AB

Well, there was a change with the Crowfoot riding, under what the commission did. As well, it affected our riding here and it had some impact on Mr. Hillyer's riding as well. What we're proposing—

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

Your changes will affect the borders of three ridings.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

LaVar Payne Conservative Medicine Hat, AB

The changes right now would affect—the proposal Jim and I have wouldn't be an issue. The only other piece that would be affected would be taking a short, small area below the Red Deer River, which currently sits in my riding and was put into Mr. Sorenson's riding of Crowfoot. I've talked to him about it, and he has no issue about allowing that to come back into the proposed new riding that I've put forward.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

So three ridings are affected, and the three MPs agree.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Jim Hillyer Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Three ridings according to this map, yes.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

If the commission accepted your proposal, it would have to change three ridings, and the numbers would be within the range of 4% or 5% of the quota.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

LaVar Payne Conservative Medicine Hat, AB

Absolutely.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

This is what is unclear to me: your proposal seems to make so much sense, and is supported so widely, that it's a little bit mysterious that the commission came with its own proposal.

Do you suspect that the commission may object to something you did not mention yet, or that there's an argument the commission will raise that will make its proposal more credible than yours?

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

LaVar Payne Conservative Medicine Hat, AB

I have difficulty understanding how it could be more credible in terms of what I've already put forward and what my colleague Mr. Hillyer has put forward.

To me, what I've put forward makes total sense. I have a difficult time understanding where the commission came from on their proposal, in particular the last proposal.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Jim Hillyer Conservative Lethbridge, AB

I don't have a difficult time understanding how they came to that. They don't live where we live. They're dealing with numbers and county lines. They based their decisions on what they heard in the public consultations, which didn't come up with these concerns because they didn't exist under map number one.

I can't guess what their objections might be, but I suspect you're right about how they'll see this: everyone's happy, it doesn't contradict our mandate, it follows our own logic. My belief is that they didn't see that they were dividing these natural tendencies.

If they can solve the problem without a domino effect, or upsetting anyone, I can't see why they would object to it.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Dion Liberal Saint-Laurent—Cartierville, QC

We are shifting Cardston and Warner, and your justification, Mr. Hillyer, in one paragraph is very, very compelling. You say that this town is not our town, this city is not our city; we have no link with it. The MP would focus so much on the city that they may neglect the rural aspect of the riding.

I think it makes sense, and I have no additional questions to ask.

Good luck.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Mr. Lukiwski, you wanted back in?

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

I have just a couple of quick questions.

What's the population of Medicine Hat, and what's the current population of Lethbridge?

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

LaVar Payne Conservative Medicine Hat, AB

Medicine Hat is about 62,000.