On this whole urban-rural thing, the idea is that, in general, if we're going to be adding population, it's a lot easier for accessibility to add it to urban ridings, where you add a few more city blocks. There's not much difference in the access to the MP.
This commission seems to be really worried about population more so than what I believe in the rural area should be geography. We have Nathan's riding; we have David's riding.
The question I would have for you, David, is this. Would you be happy just keeping the riding as it is, given the difficulty you have now of getting around? If we could really argue for that geographical point rather than trying to juggle and find out how we're going to fit the pieces of the puzzle and what we're going to do there.... What's wrong with keeping it like it is?