The problem I have, Mr. Dion, is that because my riding borders up against Alberta, there's only one way I can go. If the boundaries commission decides to make the riding larger, I have to go west. To me, to bring in Sicamous, as Mr. Atamanenko has suggested, would be challenging at best. From my residence to Revelstoke is six hours one way. Add another hour to get to Sicamous. I might as well just go to Vancouver because it's only five hours. It's a big, big area.
The problem is Penticton, in my opinion. That's the problem. The contiguation of Kootenay—Colombia is really irrelevant. It's moving west that triggers everything else. All I'm saying in the change to the commission is just bring back Nakusp and New Denver. It's 4,000 people at best. It's taking a part of the riding that I already have and just putting it back in. It's the northern part of the riding.
We have spoken, Mr. Atamanenko and I. We disagree fundamentally on some of the lines. If you were to ask Mr. Atamanenko, the problem herein is Penticton because it adds in a lot of the population. What do you do with it?