Okay, thank you.
I'd like to follow up on Mr. Lukiwski's line of questioning. He's absolutely correct that when it comes to the interaction between what the act says and what we, as parliamentarians, are empowered to do under parliamentary privilege, there can be a bit of a gap.
My reading of the act—I'll put it clearly because this was in my own speech in the House—is that there is no provision to delay or stay the effect of subsection 463(2), but as the Speaker also acknowledged and you have too, it's well within the power of Parliament to decide that, notwithstanding what the act says, we may well consider a delay or a holding in abeyance.
Our concern as parliamentarians is to act as much as possible according to the rule of law so as to support Elections Canada's role in compliance functions, so presumptively, we should do what the act says.
Is it your understanding that the act does not provide for any delay regarding subsection 463(2)?