I probably won't even get through all the good arguments I could give as much as I'd like, because I'll eventually just run out of time and be exhausted or whatever.
Nonetheless, my point remains. My point is still valid. It still points directly to this motion. The government is prepared to do anything they can to get the Conservative election law passed. That's it. And the only thing that could change it hasn't happened so far.
Is it going to happen? We're trying to buy as much time in the hopes that it might, and the government is doing everything they can to shut that down.
I say again to my fellow Canadians that the only power in this country that can stop this law from being rammed through is the collective voices of Canadians, who don't even have to pass judgment on the subject matter, on the details of the law; they can voice an expression and an opinion on the process and the lack of fairness.
If enough Canadians did that, they would think about changing. They would think about changing if enough Canadians told especially those backbenchers, the ones who are keeping their heads down low.... They don't always know what's going on. They listen to the whips when they tell them. They understand that this is an advantage to them. But if they start finding out that some of their constituents have found out what's going on and are upset about the process and the unfairness and the lack of the application of Canadian values, which is fairness.... If they find out that enough of their constituents will hold them to account, that's when you'll get another special caucus meeting—only something different happens this time. What happens is just as what happened with the income-splitting—