This is something maybe I can come back and talk to Mr. Reid about, his example of the mobile polls. I've never fully understood that, because the act says to vouch for somebody you have to be an elector in the same polling division, which is a different thing from a mobile poll, on election day. If there is a gap on vouching in that context, we definitely have to deal with it. I'm not sure there is, but if there is we should deal with it.
Thank you again. I wanted to come back to just a couple of things. The whole question of the exemption on fundraising during an election campaign, you've indicated it's not justified and that, “It is simply not possible to seek funds without including reasons for giving, and this can only constitute advertising for or against a party or a candidate.” You've given other reasons.
Mr. Mayrand also said that from his point of view, it's unmonitorable. There's a whole exemption that has been put in there in a way that he won't actually even know who's actually being contacted in any effective way so that can be monitored. I'm not sure if you heard or read that part of his testimony and if so, do you think he's accurate on that?