Perhaps I could just move on to one other aspect. There are a few things in the act that everybody has heard about. There's the fact that you have a duty to inform people who are being investigated subject to an exception. There's the fact that you can't talk about investigations subject to an exception, but that exception doesn't include when an investigation is closed. When it's closed, you won't be able to say anything. There are a bunch of things that actually seem to be new fetters, such as that you have to have a reasonable ground to suspect an offence has been committed in order to investigate. The minister suggests that was a mistake.
There's another one here, and I'm just wondering what you would have to say about it. Am I right in thinking that at the moment in the structure of Elections Canada, the CEO has delegated to you the signing authority from the consolidated revenue fund so that you can hire temporary investigators, forensic specialists, and that kind of stuff? Is that correct?