Great.
Yes, I wouldn't mind following up on what Mr. Reid has said at some point. Whether or not the individuals' residence stays where they're fleeing from or where they've moved to, I would have thought it would be where they've moved to—but anyway.
I have a question for each one of our witnesses. I appreciate that you're here, and I want to start with Leilani Farha. You mention in your submissions a passage from the South African constitutional court where it stated that the right to vote is “a badge of dignity and personhood”. You later used your own expression that it's important, in thinking about the right to vote of people who are more disadvantaged, to think about them as being more than just their circumstances. There's a perspective here that, somehow, if you're marginalized in society the right to vote is some kind of almost a privilege or side right versus an intricate and important right, if not more important to people in those circumstance. So I appreciated that.
You ended by saying that an in-person identification system, at minimum, would be needed if vouching were to be lost. Do you have any sense of what that would look like, if it actually put those dignity interests of people at the front of the design of this system? What would that look like?