On amendments G-2 and G-3, G-2 is a good start because it references the fact that the commissioner, like the ACPP, would be asked for his feedback.
This goes a bit further though, because it basically talks about consulting even before that and that the collaborative structure recognizes the very specific institutional stake the commissioner has in the interpretation of a vast chunk of the Canada Elections Act and that it should not be left to him to have to react in a feedback way in the way that the parties have to. So there is a difference there.
For the second thing, there is nothing wrong with G-3. We have a later one that we put in the commissioner's section. I think it's NDP-71—