Evidence of meeting #39 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.)
A recording is available from Parliament.
12:10 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
I call the meeting back to order.
Mr. Christopherson, on your notice of motion, The chair is going to make a ruling on your notice of motion.
12:10 p.m.
Conservative
12:10 p.m.
Conservative
12:10 p.m.
NDP
David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON
I know exactly what you're going to do, and I would just like an opportunity to maintain as many of my rights as I can.
Chair, I move:
That, in conjunction with the Order of Reference from the House of Commons of Thursday, March 27, 2014, the Committee also conduct a study into the use of the Conservative Party of Canada Constituent Information Management System (CIMS) database as a voter suppression tool in the 2011 election, and that the Prime Minister be invited to appear before the Committee to answer questions related to the usages of the CIMS database, and that in preparation for these hearings the Conservative Party of Canada provide to the Committee a list of all attempts to access the CIMS database to download exclusive lists of non-conservative supporters in the period of April 15, 2011 to May 2, 2011.
12:10 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
Thank you, Mr. Christopherson.
Your chair will have to rule against your motion due to the fact that it is outside of the scope of this committee. It asks for a study of a political party, and that's not in the role of this committee.
12:10 p.m.
NDP
David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON
Chair, with the greatest of respect, I challenge the ruling of the chair.
12:10 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
All right. We will move without debate directly to a vote on that.
12:10 p.m.
NDP
David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON
On a point of order on process, is there an opportunity for the two sides to be made before the vote takes place: why I'm asking for it, and the chair's position?
12:10 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
When you challenge the chair, you go directly to a vote.
The vote will be, and I'll have the clerk—
12:10 p.m.
NDP
David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON
Even though the Standing Orders clearly state that this is within our mandate, I can't make that case. You're just going to shut me down.
12:10 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
I'm not arguing, David. Let's do the vote or let's finish the meeting, whichever you want.
You challenged the chair, first of all. I know it's not right for the chair to take any offence to that. However, our playing well together has been hurt by this, so let's do the vote.
Do we sustain the chair's ruling? An affirmative vote would be in favour of the chair's ruling.
12:10 p.m.
An hon. member
A recorded vote, please.
12:10 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
(Ruling of the chair sustained [See Minutes of Proceedings])
The chair's ruling stands.
Is there anything else for the good of the committee today?
Seeing nothing, the meeting is adjourned.