Mr. Williamson, I want to follow a bit on Tom's questions.
Regarding the list of 19 offences, they have an animating idea of connection to office—that's the way you've explained it—but then there's an added layer. You seem to be suggesting it includes offences that somehow or other go to abuse of the taxpayer.
I'm wondering whether there are any crimes on this list that you would have an overarching provision for to say that if this crime is committed in relation to office.... I'm looking at possession of property over $5,000, theft over $5,000. These are clearly crimes, but as explained, they don't necessarily cover only offences in office.
Will there be an overarching provision in your amendment, which we're going to have to work for, to say that it's these crimes as long as they are committed in these circumstances? Is that the way you envision it?