I'm not being critical of your bill here. I honestly don't know the answer to this myself. I'm just raising the question. If a member were expelled for some reason but not convicted of a punishable crime, an indictable crime, in a court of law, but were expelled because the House believed his offence, or whatever he did, was serious enough to expel him, do you believe in this case that your bill should have provisions to cover that, that the MP should lose his pension?
On September 30th, 2014. See this statement in context.