Okay. That helps. Thank you.
To the extent that the only choice on offer in the Lords' heads was this system or the first-past-the-post system, and with a precedent of 81 candidates I can well imagine why those two combined really didn't lead to a successive elimination ballot being in contention at all. Thank you for that.
You also spoke about how you would tell anybody who would listen that it was a waste not to go down the list and actually vote your extra preferences. You were describing how in the course of that, effectively some were thinking that a strategic way to vote would be to not do that and to just put their first and maybe their second preference, but not to actually go down the list. Did it seem to just come intuitively to the average Lord when they were voting that it was a strategic thing to do to simply put the first thing, and did you really have to make an effort to say that wasn't smart?