That's very interesting, because in fact in AV systems more generally candidates do actively encourage their voters to vote strategically and sometimes they will actively tell them who to put as second or third in order to increase their overall chances. They often tell them to do exactly what you said was “put about” in the Lords election, which was just to put one. So combatting people's sense that they should and can vote strategically would be an issue, from my perspective.
The last thing I wanted to ask was if you could elaborate just a little bit on what you were saying about the Lords not really wanting to go for successive elimination ballots. You said they just wouldn't have the stomach for it. You mean, I assume, that a certain degree of cobbling and politicking might go on between the rounds and that it really wouldn't suit the temper of the Lords? Is that what you were referring to?