I want to move on to help make clear the reason you suggested. You've effectively suggested moving what is now going to sit in the amending act as a retroactive or retrospective kind of clause and putting it into the wording of the bill, so that it will actually sit in the members of Parliament act.
My understanding, and correct me if I am wrong, is that you think that that serves a transparency function. It will be known, if it's actually sitting in the act, that it has this retrospective aspect and you don't have to go chasing an amending piece of legislation to know that fact.
Is that part of the reasoning?