I think they are very similar. The differences in the wording are modest, and there are a couple of important differences. One is that language I referred to earlier, making it clear that it applies to a conviction that occurred either before or after the coming into force of the act. I think that's valuable language that's worth incorporating.
I haven't studied Bill No. 80 in any depth, but my understanding is that there was also a provision that allowed for the withdrawal of funds from the pension entitlement for dependants, and I'm sure that has been part of your conversation as well. That may be a provision that's worth considering so that the denial of the benefit to the member who has committed the serious crime doesn't impose hardship on spouse or children.