I know that we can come back to G-1 later, but if NDP-3 is withdrawn, we won't be able to go back to it and G-1 will stay.
In the opinion of the experts from whom we have heard, having a list would be problematic because it would include too many offences and omit just as many. It would be very difficult to work with a list.
Everything covered under G-1 could be covered under our amendment, which is accomplishing exactly what Mr. Williamson was trying to do by introducing his bill; it is plugging this loophole.
I have a bit of trouble understanding why we cannot just pass our amendment, which covers everything that the House and the Senate will ultimately deem sufficient to revoke those people's pensions.