It's distracting.
Evidence of meeting #63 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was shall.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #63 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was shall.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
Yes, it's way too laid back here today.
Shall clause 5 carry? No.
Do we want a recorded vote on that or are we okay?
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
All right.
(Clause 5 negatived)
(On clause 6)
We're now on to amendment G-2, which was already covered under the consequential amendment G-1.
Therefore, we'll now move to the amended clause 6.
(Clause 6 as amended agreed to)
(On clause 7)
Go ahead, Mr. Lukiwski.
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
The government will be voting against clause 7.
December 11th, 2014 / 11:15 a.m.
Conservative
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
We're all fine with it being defeated?
All right.
(Clause 7 negatived)
(On clause 8)
Clause 8 is not amended. It sits as it is.
Is there any conversation on clause 8?
Mr. Lukiwski.
Conservative
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
It will be voting against clause 8.
Are we having a discussion over that?
NDP
Craig Scott NDP Toronto—Danforth, ON
We voted to keep it last time. At the same time that was a symbolic vote, so we're okay with that.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
Right.
We're governed on that then.
(Clause 8 negatived)
(On clause 9)
We have amendment G-3 to start off with.
Mr. Lukiwski, may I have you move that?
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
All right.
Then we have a number of NDP subamendments on clause 9. No, we don't. Sorry.
You're right. I'll get to those.
Amendment G-3 has been moved.
Is there discussion on it?
Mr. Lukiwski.
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
It gives further clarification on, in the event of a tie, who actually will be presiding over the vote. There's a little bit more precision in case there are two members. For example, if both have the same length of service and you don't actually know which one shall take the chair to preside over the proceedings, it's the one who appears first in the Gazette. It just closes a loophole in case there were any problems with determining exactly who should be the one to preside over the—
Conservative
NDP
Craig Scott NDP Toronto—Danforth, ON
I have a quick question.
Does this relate to this, or do we deal with this later?
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
No, we're going to be dealing with this separately.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
Okay.
(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
I would ask Mr. Lukiwski to move amendment G-4.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
That will lead us to three NDP subamendments, subamendment 2, subamendment 3, and subamendment 4.
Mr. Scott, would you like to move them, please?