I have them under the act, but I don't have them under the code.
In fact, with respect to summoning witnesses, it's actually never been necessary, even under the act, for me to do that. People have always cooperated when I've asked them, and they've always given me the documents when I've asked. But I just think it should be a provision in the code as well as in the act.
With respect to direct access to any document requested from the House of Commons, I issued a report a couple of years ago in which I itemized the problem I had. In order to get the documents—the members' documents—that are in the custody of the House, I have to go through the bureaucracy in the House.
What was decided in that case was that the person who was the subject of the investigation was given the documents to give to me; in other words, they wouldn't give them directly to me, so they could withdraw any of them or do anything they wanted with them on the way to me. Of course when I'm investigating, I'm trying to get outside sources.
In that particular case, I was actually getting similar documents or the same documents from other sources, and I knew that I was receiving documents that I did not receive but that were supposed to have been found by the House. That's what I'm trying to cure there.