I am going to get to my sixth point, which is a structural point about statute versus the code in the form that we have. There is a separate distinction between a statute-like, detailed language, although you've indicated that your act is a fairly simple document, in your language, versus a more general, common-sense language that not only MPs but the public can understand. You could have each kind of language in either kind of document. Do you have any sense at all of whether you prefer statute versus code, and great precision versus being closer to general principles?
On April 21st, 2015. See this statement in context.