Evidence of meeting #111 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was identification.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Andrew Lauzon
Scott Jones  Deputy Chief, Information Technology Security, Communications Security Establishment
Coty Zachariah  National Chairperson, Canadian Federation of Students
Justine De Jaegher  Executive Director, Canadian Federation of Students
Jason Besner  Director, Cyber Threat Evaluation Centre, Information Technology Security, Communications Security Establishment
Daniel Therrien  Privacy Commissioner of Canada, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Vihar Joshi  Deputy Judge Advocate General, Administrative Law, Canadian Forces
Regan Morris  Legal Counsel, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Barbara Bucknell  Director, Policy, Parliamentary Affairs and Research, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Ian Lee  Associate Professor, Carleton University, As an Individual
Arthur Hamilton  Lawyer, Conservative Party of Canada

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

Scott Simms Liberal Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame, NL

Sorry, I don't mean to cut you off. We don't have a lot of time. The reason that I ask is that now we're looking at more involvement by Elections Canada, not only just where and when to vote, which is obviously applicable to here, but to encourage them to be more proactive as to the voting in the next election and that it's easier, and it's a constitutional right.

Do you think this will help Elections Canada? Do you think they have a ways to go when it comes to promoting voting for members of the military?

5:15 p.m.

Col Vihar Joshi

Certainly informing members about how to vote and their right to vote will help. Through the education program, that certainly will help get the message out to Canadian Forces' electors on how they can vote and where they can vote. I think it will go a long way to encouraging people to exercise their right to vote.

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

Scott Simms Liberal Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame, NL

That's good to hear. It may not be particularly pertinent on Bill C-76, but certainly your message that maybe Elections Canada step up a bit to inform people about the statement of ordinary residence, and so on.... It's not to say that you're not. I'm just thinking you could always use some help.

Thank you.

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

We'll go back to Tom.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Kmiec Conservative Calgary Shepard, AB

I will go back to the commissioner for one last question, and then I will hand it over to my colleague.

Organizations and political parties usually have a privacy officer. It just came to me at the end of our exchange that there are certified professionals in human resources who work in a lot of these places.

Doesn't this partly also make the case for ensuring our people are certified, and that they have professional standards to meet in order to ensure that privacy rules are in place? I know you said that in this particular piece of legislation it doesn't outline exactly the contents of the privacy rule for the workplace or for the organization. If you have certified people there managing it, their professional college will ensure that it meets certain requirements set out. I was a registrar before. Privacy is part of human resources' standards of practice, the kind of professional code they have. In Quebec there's a registered association that oversees this, just like for accountants who oversee audited financial statements.

Doesn't this make the case for ensuring there are certified people in those organizations, including political parties?

5:20 p.m.

Privacy Commissioner of Canada, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada

Daniel Therrien

PIPEDA has accountability as one of its 10 principles. The accountability principle requires organizations subject to PIPEDA to appoint a point of contact for consumers or individuals, and that person has certain responsibilities for privacy protection within the organization.

There is no certification per se in privacy. There are some associations and courses given so there is a semi-certification process. Certainly, it is desirable that the point of contact be quite knowledgeable in privacy legislation, but at this point it is not a strict requirement.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Colonel Joshi, thanks for your service to our country.

I would say there are a lot of things in this legislation that I have concerns with, but—surprise—there are some things in a bill this size that I do agree with. This is one of those areas that is going to make it easier for the men and women who serve our country in uniform to have voting options. I think that's a great thing.

At the end of the day, those of you who serve our country in uniform are the ones who protect our right to vote, and the least we can do is to make it a little easier for you to exercise that right. It's something I do appreciate in this legislation.

I want to touch on it a bit and get a bit more from you. You mentioned the current provisions, where there is the SOR and where the only option for Canadian Forces electors is that period called the military voting period that's between 14 days and nine days before the election. That's the only option currently, correct?

5:20 p.m.

Col Vihar Joshi

There is a very slight window. For people who happen to live in the district that pertains to their SOR, they can vote but only on polling day.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

So it's only if that exists. We're not just talking about those who were deployed overseas; we're talking about anybody, even on a base here in Canada unless it happens to be the riding that's in their SOR.

5:20 p.m.

Col Vihar Joshi

That is correct.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

One can understand why that might have been the case for someone deployed overseas, but certainly on a base here in Canada you would think that other options should be available. So it's good to see.

Do you want to give us some hints as to what the challenges would be for someone to vote who would be deployed overseas? This business of 14 to nine days I can see being a problem, but what other methods are available for someone who is deployed overseas, and how would they utilize them?

5:20 p.m.

Col Vihar Joshi

We will be maintaining the military vote for overseas members. They will still be able to avail themselves of that mechanism.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

It would still be only in that small five-day period.

5:20 p.m.

Col Vihar Joshi

That is correct. It would be if they were to avail themselves of that—

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Would that be a challenge, that five-day period? Obviously on certain missions, maybe during that period of time you would not be where voting would be possible.

5:20 p.m.

Col Vihar Joshi

It could be a challenge, but every effort is made to ensure that the ability to vote is there. There are systems in place to—

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Why not just expand that window?

5:20 p.m.

Col Vihar Joshi

The big issue is to get the ballots back to Ottawa to be counted. It's a logistical issue.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

I get that at a certain point they have to get back. You could probably allow it a little sooner, I don't know. Can you explain to us what other options might be available for personnel deployed overseas?

5:20 p.m.

Col Vihar Joshi

The other options would be the same that are available to Canadian citizens who are abroad.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

You mean a mail ballot?

5:25 p.m.

Col Vihar Joshi

Yes, if that's a possibility, depending on where they're serving at the time.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Are there any other options? Would that be the extent of it at that point, the special ballot process where you mail it to the military base or wherever? Or would they still use the process that exists now, the only difference being that they wouldn't have declared a place of ordinary residence? What would that look like?

5:25 p.m.

Col Vihar Joshi

Their place of ordinary residence would be the ordinary residence before they went overseas.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

It would be on the register of electors rather than in some separate—