Evidence of meeting #125 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was election.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Trevor Knight  Senior Counsel, Legal Services, Elections Canada
Jean-François Morin  Senior Policy Advisor, Privy Council Office
Anne Lawson  Deputy Chief Electoral Officer, Regulatory Affairs, Elections Canada
Stephanie Kusie  Calgary Midnapore, CPC
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Andrew Lauzon
Jennifer O'Connell  Pickering—Uxbridge, Lib.
Linda Lapointe  Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, Lib.
Manon Paquet  Senior Policy Advisor, Privy Council Office
Philippe Méla  Legislative Clerk

7:05 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

If this passes, that wipes out LIB-30, doesn't it?

7:05 p.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

Correct me if I'm wrong, but at page 124 of the bill, line 7, I think that proposed section 349.95 has been repealed by another Liberal provision.

7:10 p.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

Just so you know, we're not planning to move amendment LIB-30.

7:10 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

You're not moving LIB-30, so this would be a stand-alone. Then, what it's trying to do, this is not the commingling money, this is just preventing somebody from circumventing the intention of the bill to not have foreign money influence the election.

Am I right, John? That seems like a good idea.

7:10 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

Again, I think it outlines the definition of the actions of collusion, again, not with the specific actions for completely avoiding it, as we've discussed in detail earlier. I think it provides a more clear definition.

7:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Yes.

7:10 p.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

Mr. Chair, am I right in thinking that amendment LIB-29 was carried as a result of either amendments LIB-27 or LIB-26 being carried?

7:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

It was carried because LIB-26 passed.

7:10 p.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

Okay, amendment LIB-29 deleted from the bill proposed section 349.95.

7:10 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

This is recreating it.

7:10 p.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

Is it?

7:10 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

If we deleted a section of the bill and now we have an amendment reintroducing a proposed section, but differently....

7:10 p.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

No, it refers to a proposed section that no longer exists. That's all.

7:10 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Right, because it's not a stand-alone proposed section.

7:10 p.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

So this should be cancelled by consequence.

7:10 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Right, so that might be something that I'm not sure we can handle. If what the Conservatives are trying to do in their amendment is to strengthen the proposed section, which was eliminated three or five votes ago—

7:10 p.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

It's a house of cards.

7:10 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

House of Cards is a great show—a little dark.

7:10 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Yes, very dark.

7:10 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

But it's not as dark as the reality.

7:10 p.m.

Voices

Oh, oh!

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

John Nater Conservative Perth—Wellington, ON

At the same time, the amendment deals with proposed section 349.95.

7:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

You're not bringing forward LIB-30, right?

7:10 p.m.

Liberal

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

That's right. LIB-30 is withdrawn.

7:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

It will not be brought forward.