Evidence of meeting #126 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was agreed.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Stephanie Kusie  Calgary Midnapore, CPC
Jean-François Morin  Senior Policy Advisor, Privy Council Office
Trevor Knight  Senior Counsel, Legal Services, Elections Canada
Robert Sampson  Legal Counsel, Legal Services, Elections Canada
Philippe Méla  Legislative Clerk

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

We're going to new clause 252.1 now.

4:50 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

This is not actually a new amendment. It's a new clause after clause 252.

4:50 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

Oh, pardon me. Okay.

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

We have two Conservative proposals that add a clause after clause 252, which we just approved.

The first one is reference number 10009236.

Would the Conservatives present that amendment, please.

4:55 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

Sure. This ensures that the solicitor-client privilege is not waived on litigation expense disclosures. I think that we are seeing in society at all levels of government, more and more litigation with elections and with outcomes of elections. I am hoping we're going the way of the United States—that's a joke.

We believe ensuring that the solicitor-client privilege is not waived on litigation expense disclosures provides for more transparency in the disclosure process.

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Mr. de Burgh Graham.

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

Monsieur Morin, do you have any comments on this?

LCdr Jean-François Morin

No.

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Or on the United States?

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

LCdr Jean-François Morin

No.

Seriously, Mr. Graham, I don't have any specific comments. I'll only say that in recent years—and I don't have specific cases to note—the Supreme Court of Canada has repeatedly reinforced the importance of solicitor-client privilege in Canada, and I don't think that anyone would require the disclosure of such documents.

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

Okay. Thank you.

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Yes, Mrs. Kusie.

Stephanie Kusie

I'm sorry. To clarify, Monsieur Morin, the solicitor-client privilege is something that.... The privilege of clients to not identify their solicitor, is that something that is in law at present? Is it a privilege that you do not have to disclose who your solicitor is?

LCdr Jean-François Morin

No—

4:55 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

I'm asking that.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

Yes, I'm sorry. The solicitor-client privilege is about protecting the communications between the client and the solicitor.

4:55 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

I see. Pardon me. My apologies. I misunderstood that.

Okay, I will leave it at that, then.

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Mr. Graham, are we ready to vote?

David Graham Liberal Laurentides—Labelle, QC

I am.

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

All in favour of the CPC amendment with reference number 10009236 please signify.

4:55 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

That was 10009234, I believe.

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Was it 10009234 that you introduced?

4:55 p.m.

Calgary Midnapore, CPC

Stephanie Kusie

That's correct.

(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings]

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Now you can introduce the amendment with the reference number 10009236.