Oh, but then there might actually be commercial travel available, right?
The point is, we would accept that, yes, there are going to be some weeks when a prime minister can't be there for the entire week. If you put it in the Standing Orders that a prime minister must be present in the House of Commons every Wednesday to answer all of the questions, well, that would create some problems on the other hand. We expect the Prime Minister to be in question period more than he is, quite frankly. We would like him to be there more often than he is, but the schedule of a prime minister can fluctuate and has to be responsive to all kinds of different things. That's why the Standing Orders don't prescribe who has to be there to answer which questions and at which times.
That's what's sort of strange about this whole discussion even, in the context of a debate about the Standing Orders. What we've said all along is that if the Prime Minister wants to answer questions, he can go ahead and do that. He doesn't have to force this through the committee in this sort of aggressive way without the engagement of the opposition, which he seems to be intent on doing. He can just get up and answer questions.