And we get to vote first, and we have more legroom.
Actually, Mr. Chair, if you'll indulge me I want to address something that is related to the Standing Orders. It's concerns voting on private members' bills, since you mentioned that.
It's an important discussion actually, and the Speaker has mentioned the process for that a couple of times, but backbenchers vote first, so there is no visual cue to members from the whip or from the party leader or from the leadership on how a vote is undertaken on a certain matter. Certainly, information can be provided to members in advance of how a whip or a House leadership would encourage you to vote on a piece of private members' business, but not seeing how someone's going to vote first presents an interesting opportunity for private members, because you don't know, you cannot predict with full certainty, how your caucus is going to vote on the matter. We've seen a couple of situations in which people started voting line by line, not realizing that they might not be entirely in favour of that certain matter. The ability to stand up and vote on a private member's bill without first having a visual cue from your party leadership, I think, is a fascinating matter.
I don't know when that came into being, and perhaps I'll task the good folks behind me with finding out when that rule change came into effect, but I do think it is somewhat in line with one of the McGrath report recommendations on digital or electronic voting, the reason being....
Go ahead.