No, no, but that's what I'm saying. We lose sight of that. This modernization shouldn't be about making my job easier. It's how do we do things differently, so that we can best represent our ridings. I don't agree with the premise that this is what it is. You missed my comments. I don't believe for one second that Ms. Chagger actually authored that paper.
Your comment was that perhaps there were others around who were thinking that this was going to be a win in the media, but it has backfired. We always have to remember, and I've said this a number of times, that if you go back to parliamentary privileges, one of them is freedom of speech. It's not freedom of our speech; it's freedom to be the voices of our electors. We should never do anything that mutes, limits, or takes away their voice. That's so important.
I'll leave it at that. I've talked enough. I really appreciate your comments, and I'm going to leave it there.