I have a point of order.
While we're dealing with points of order, I want to ask, Chair, if you think this is acceptable in terms of the regular business of this committee.
Mr. Lamoureux is not even a member of this committee. The government members went out of their way to say how grown-up they were, that they were quite capable of leading themselves, and they didn't need Mr. Lamoureux for that. The guy's not even a member of the committee. He represents the government, the PMO. He's leading all the discussions, and the real members of the committee are just sitting there.
Is that regular business to you, Chair? Is that a new era? Do you see anything a little bit amiss here with this kind of dialogue?