I have a point of order, Chair.
First, thank you for the clarification on that. I wasn't sure of the correctness of that, or the incorrectness.
Although I do note that Mr. Spengemann has been subbed out of the committee now, he is still present. I wonder if he could confirm for us—because this may change the ruling, I don't know—whether or not there's any legal action currently under way that he would be a party to, related to this. Would that then change the ruling?