Correct.
There's a provision for failure to report. At some point, if it's so patently false, it may amount to a failure to report, but we get into shades of grey. I think other provisions in the act dealing with other kinds of financial reports make that distinction. First, there's an obligation to file, with an associated penalty if you don't file. Second, there's a separate obligation for the timeline. That's a recommendation that's in the table, to separate the obligation to file from the timeline. Third, there is a prohibition on providing false or misleading information.
I think it is preferable to separate all three, from a compliance and enforcement point of view. But in this case, only the first two are in the bill, actually. There is nothing about false and misleading information in this bill.