On a point of order, what I was trying to understand or seek was some clarification as to how you would see the procedure working here, and I appreciate your efforts to give clarification. Obviously Mr. Gerretsen indicated that he was moving this by consent, which would indicate that it's something other than just putting a motion forward. My assumption is that he was doing so based on the precedent that we set in the last Parliament, that Standing Orders would be changed only by consent. I'm just trying to get clarification from him as to the reason he is moving it that way. Is that, in fact, the reason—the precedent that we change the Standing Orders only by consent, or...?
I am asking, through you, if you can ask Mr. Gerretsen to give us some clarification on the reason he has moved it in such a way.