I'd like to hear about that because we were told by a representative of Zoom the other day that the interpretation could be done through their platform, and it sounds to me like you're telling me that maybe that's not the case.
Quickly, before you answer that, could you also answer this for me? Your association sent a brief to our committee. It says that there is “conclusive proof that the quality of sound these [teleconferences] provide never come close to the quality of sound needed for” remote simultaneous interpretation.
Is there a research paper or a study where you've pulled this from that you could table with the committee for us?
You—or Ms. Gagnon, if she'd like to—can go also ahead and give me a bit more information.