Thank you, Madam Chair.
I appreciate the suggestion Mr. Richards made, but I would say, respectfully, that I think the motion he is suggesting would be out of order, given what you've just stipulated.
I wonder if removing confidentiality from the report requires a motion at all, since I think the motion that Mr. Richards is proposing would be out of order technically. As you said, only motions that pertain to witnesses and their scheduling seem to be in order, if I'm not mistaken.