I still think there remains a question about the constitutionality of the idea that “presence” could mean virtual. I don't think a requirement to change the Standing Orders would be enough to necessarily effect this change. It may actually be unconstitutional as well.
Having said that, there's still a debate around the idea of virtual versus, maybe, hybrid sittings. I could make a suggestion for that last part. If it's accepted, great. If not, then I wouldn't be able to support it.
For the part after “extraordinary circumstances”, we could change it to read, “hybrid sittings with at least 20 MPs present in the chamber meet the requirements for quorum”, and then it would carry on as is from there. The difference would be that we're doing what we've done with the sittings we've had lately, where you have 20 people present and the rest could be virtual as long as we've met that quorum requirement. Then we don't have the issues with the Constitution, and so on.