I think the most important consideration is to vote on drafting a set of procedural rules. I know that this proposal can be taken into consideration separately from that relative to the method of applying that set of rules.
I was very comfortable with Ms. Blaney's proposal, but I would not want to be prevented from debating the drafting of a set of procedural rules. I was wondering whether it would be possible to first vote on the equivalent of what is proposed in LIB 1 and BQ 10—in other words, preparing a set of procedural rules and then voting on Ms. Blaney's proposal. I propose that this be done by unanimous consent and that, if the proposal is rejected, we be able to vote on using majority consent instead.