I just want to make sure that I have understood correctly. The amendment proposal would be roughly the equivalent of our current approach, where the parties agree to begin the process and also agree on the period of time. Is that correct?
That is done every time the period of time is up and the parties come to a new agreement. They decide on a new time period and, once there is no longer agreement, that is over. That is exactly what we have now. That is the gist of your proposal, right?