I think the work that Andre has done in terms of building that section has been very well done. I think it talks about some of our witness testimony, about how the hybrid model could actually address a lot of the potential legal challenges of an interpretation of how a hybrid model could work.
Again, I'm not in favour of LIB 10, and I just think, again, it speaks to the narrative or the tone of the report that completely puts a hybrid model to the side. It goes through, again, the witness testimony, how this model could be done safely, how it could work and those types of things.
To go back and have the recommendation be that we just add virtual proceedings without any sort of acknowledgement that a hybrid model can address some of the legal questions or testimony we've heard and the opportunities to help us return back in a safe timeline and manner whenever that may be.... I just don't think the recommendation is acknowledging what's in that section of the report.
Thank you.