Madam Chair, again, while I appreciate the amendments by Ms. Petitpas Taylor in an effort to get a compromise, I'll just go back to the idea “with the possibility of employing a hybrid model in the interim”. I'm hoping to have a discussion here to hear from government members and others that the hybrid model should be the foundation of what we're doing, and as we build that capacity it's done from the hybrid model out.
To Mr. Turnbull's and Mr. Alghabra's point, heaven forbid we have a second or a third wave. I hope we don't, but I fully agree with you that it might go up and down. Recommendations from provinces and regions about physical attendance may go up and may go down, and some travel may be restricted at times. It's the hybrid model that can be the foundation, not in the interim, but the foundation of everything. As we need to go up and down, we're using the chamber as our basis for everything.
My concern with this is the tone we're setting is saying, “Well, the hybrid is interim and it will go away when virtual is at full capacity.” I don't agree with that. If it's not the case that we support hybrid, I think we need to be clearer that hybrid can be the foundation, and go back and forth on that.