Madam Chair, I'll be brief on the question that was asked about a title. Essentially, that's what's being done here. Regardless of whether we call it a deputy vice-chair or we add an additional vice-chair, we're creating a new title for someone. The only reason it's a different title is due to the advice we received on procedural issues. We had to come up with something that worked for it to have the effect it was intended to have.
The bottom line here is that this is a role that didn't exist. It has never existed. It's being created. I'm simply trying to be helpful in trying to make it clear so that people don't call into question whether this was created simply to give certain members of Parliament in the smaller opposition parties extra salaries...or maybe the appearance that there could be a minority government trying to ensure that they have bi-support from one of those parties, or both. I'm not suggesting that's the case. I'm just trying to help remove that appearance by simply having a motion that allows for the recognition that I believe people are looking for here. That's what's being asked for—a recognition—and I'm trying to help provide that. It is about a title. We're trying to make sure that, for the appearance of Canadians, it doesn't appear to be about something more than that, which would be extra pay for someone.
That's the spirit of this. I certainly hope we can help remove any of those appearances [Technical difficulty—Editor] by having members support this.