To Mr. Gerretsen's point, if this is truly about a title, and the work is not expected to be done in the manner in which the two vice-chairs will be doing the work, then there is no need for any additional compensation for this work—if this is truly about a title. That's the point I would want to make.
On the issue of consensus, we saw, as Mr. Richards tried to move the amendment, that there was no consensus on that with respect to the third vice-chair position being renamed deputy vice-chair. To go back to what I said last week—I'll have more to say about it later on—the convention around this place is that consensus is needed in order for anything to be changed. To change the tactics through motions, through different avenues or vehicles, is not the way we traditionally do things around here. I'm really disturbed at the direction in which we're heading on this particular matter.