Thank you for that, Mr. Bosc.
I'd like to follow up on that, and I'll open this up to Mr. Blaikie and the other witnesses as well.
There is an idea of unanimous consent among the recognized parties for these types of changes. We are talking about fundamental changes to the way the House of Commons operates, though I think there was a consensus on this panel that this is very clearly for temporary situations. For any of these changes where we fundamentally alter how we operate as a House, how important do you think it is that there is that consent among recognized parties to make those changes, even on a temporary basis?