I think it certainly provides a narrative.
To go back to the previous question, there is always going to be an acknowledgement of any other political narrative that's relevant.
To be honest, in my view, even though the Standing Orders have created a reporting requirement, the Prime Minister, as the person who holds the power to advise prorogation, from a constitutional perspective, does not have to have good reasons. It's the way it is. You can prorogue. People can get angry with you about it, but you can still do it.