Sure. I would be happy to do so.
I apologize that I will be explaining it in English. Hopefully, the translation comes through. I don't feel as comfortable explaining this in my second official language.
Very simply, the original amendment from Mr. Lauzon basically said that the non-appearance of the Prime Minister would be noted in the report as an annex. My amendment would provide a recommendation that the committee be given the power to compel the Prime Minister to appear at the committee. If this report goes to the House of Commons, concurrence is moved and the House concurs in the report, the committee would therefore have the power to compel the appearance of the Prime Minister before this committee. It's a little more meaty. There are more teeth to this subamendment to compel the Prime Minister's testimony before this committee.
I hope that clarifies it.
Thank you, Madam Chair.