I'm happy to respond, Madam Chair.
It would depend on the will of Parliament. A concurrence motion is scheduled in the House typically for three hours, unless an intervening dilatory motion prevents that. That would be, for example, a motion to move to orders of the day, a motion to adjourn the debate or a motion to adjourn the House, which would be less than likely. After three hours of debate on a concurrence motion, it would then be put to the House to vote upon it.
It is a time-limited debate in the House, so there is not an opportunity to put up multiple speakers to filibuster it to no end. Once the debate is completed, it would then be put to the House.
Obviously right now we're under special orders that the vote be deferred until the time prescribed, typically the next day after question period. That would be the process, so there would not be an opportunity for the government members, or any members for that matter, to filibuster a committee report.
There would still be the option for any member to move a dilatory motion to prevent that debate from being completed.
Hopefully that clarifies it. I enjoy parliamentary procedure. I don't say that I'm an expert on all aspects of it. I've learned over the years from people who are far smarter than I am, including one of our well-known experts, Mr. John Holtby. He is the co-editor of Beauchesne's Parliamentary Rules and Forms. He is one of the wonderful people who provide advice to us from time to time. I learned from those people and I try to put as much of it into the back of my head as possible.
Hopefully, that clarifies it for you, Ms. Vecchio.