Again, I'll say that, for physical security, you're already capably protected by people like the Sergeant-at-Arms and his staff. I think vetting people by a star chamber composed of members of Parliament and others.... Again, it's just too easy to see this working against the interests of Canadians. It's adding another layer of bureaucracy and another layer of staff. This comes with costs.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: You have to listen to people you find disagreeable and with whom you disagree. You disagree around this table. I've just watched it. That's part of your job. You may find there will be people coming to the House of Commons whom some people find objectionable. However, you invite them because they have a point of view you want to hear. Unless there is a physical threat to a member of Parliament, a senator or the House more generally, I don't think you should keep anyone out.
However—